2026-01-12 19:33:06
| 14. Constraints and Future Work This document is a conceptual design; implementation requires substantial engineering and
institutional work. Open issues include: the drop-off model excludes fragile items; optimization of
home-unit sensors and cameras; optimal placement of IMS sites; standardization of power,
communications, and maintenance; and social acceptance (regulation, insurance, and liability
boundaries).
Tokenomics questions include: designing an initial capped supply and a post-cap issuance policy;
resistance to abuse in usage-based voting; and transparent reporting methods for minimum
maintenance costs. Staged expansion outlook (from household convenience to backbone) In an initial stage, the key benefit is enabling immediate shipments to and from manufacturers,
warehouses, and individuals while staying at home. Due to the drop-off model and other constraints,
items may be limited to small, non-fragile goods.
Once this convenience is experienced, the network could expand beyond utility poles into a larger
backbone network, potentially using linear-motor technology to handle fragile goods - and eventually
even human transport. If people could travel as 'packets', the travel experience itself could become an
attraction. In an era that may include epidemics, single- or two-person pods that go door-to-door
without unnecessary transfers could reduce contact and friction.
For seniors, such a system could preserve mobility even after a driver's license expires. Optimizing
logistics may also reduce traffic accidents and create broader social benefits.
For that future, the author hopes the project can start small - with ordinary electromagnetic coils and
metal spheres - and expand step by step.
|
physical internet